<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who cares about measuring inflation correctly? Taxpayers should</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ronanlyons.com/2009/11/03/who-cares-about-measuring-inflation-correctly-taxpayers-should/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ronanlyons.com/2009/11/03/who-cares-about-measuring-inflation-correctly-taxpayers-should/</link>
	<description>Irish Economy &#124; World Economy &#124; Property Market &#124; Economic Analysis &#124; Ronan Lyons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:32:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Denny</title>
		<link>http://www.ronanlyons.com/2009/11/03/who-cares-about-measuring-inflation-correctly-taxpayers-should/comment-page-1/#comment-1169</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Denny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ronanlyons.com/?p=1009#comment-1169</guid>
		<description>I think there is a strong argument here for increasing the frequency of the Household Budget Survey: too much can happen in 5 years. The equivalent in the UK, the FES, is annual. 

There is an older argument for not targetting 0% inflation which has some merit: essentially its about real &amp; relative wage flexibility. It is very difficult to reduce nominal wages so this means that it can be very difficult to change relative  wages. If you have a bit of inflation in the system then nominal wages need to be constantly adjusted. This gives you the opportunity to make changes in real wages &amp; hence to also change relativities: modest inflation helps oil the wheels of the labour market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is a strong argument here for increasing the frequency of the Household Budget Survey: too much can happen in 5 years. The equivalent in the UK, the FES, is annual. </p>
<p>There is an older argument for not targetting 0% inflation which has some merit: essentially its about real &amp; relative wage flexibility. It is very difficult to reduce nominal wages so this means that it can be very difficult to change relative  wages. If you have a bit of inflation in the system then nominal wages need to be constantly adjusted. This gives you the opportunity to make changes in real wages &amp; hence to also change relativities: modest inflation helps oil the wheels of the labour market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
