Ronan Lyons | Personal Website
Ronan Lyons | Personal Website

Can we ignore higher corporate and property taxes?

Today, S&P announced that Ireland’s sovereign debt rating has been cut again, down to AA. Given this, which comes as no surprise, and given the latest Exchequer figures to come out last week, I thought it might be no harm to recap the bigger picture on the government’s revenue side (the expenditure side is a thesis in itself).

A quick look back shows that tax revenue peaked in 2007, at €47.25bn, up from €45.5bn a year earlier. Income tax and VAT comprised about 30% each, while almost another 30% came from corporation tax and from customs & excise. The remainder was made up of 7% each from capital taxes (gains and acquisitions) and from stamp duties.

Fast forward to mid-2009 and tax revenues are scheduled to come in this year about €35bn (Ulster Bank suggest €34.4bn as a more exact figure). So far this year, VAT has stumped up almost 40% of revenues, while income tax has given us another 34%. That’s almost three quarters of our tax revenues coming from sources that used to produce just 60%. Meanwhile, capital taxes and stamps – which had given the government about 15% of its revenues in 2006/2007 – have given it just 4.4% so far this year. Customs and excise has been largely static, in relative terms, while corporation tax is also likely to come in at about 14%.

Where are the holes, then, and how should they be plugged? The Irish government had targeted what now looks like an astonishing €57bn in tax revenues in 2009, as recently as 2007. I think if one were to suggest to them today a way of getting our tax revenues back up to where they were in 2007 – €47bn – they’d bite your hand off. (For sustainable public finances, incidentally, that would mean cutting back total government expenditure from the €56bn+ of 2008/2009 back at least to 2007 levels, €51bn, and ideally to €47bn.)

The government has a choice. It can choose to keep the broad structure of the Irish taxation system the same and work on getting each source of revenue back up to where it was. Or it can try to fundamentally revise the taxation system. Suppose they want to do the former, given that Irish taxation policy has, at least on the face of it, been very successful in attracting capital and labour here. In that case, the graph below is important, as it shows how the €12bn in lost tax revenues, comparing an annualized 2009 with 2007, breaks down by taxation type.

Ireland's €12bn tax hole in 2009, by taxation type
Ireland's €12bn tax hole in 2009, by taxation type

Interestingly, the smallest gap is in income tax, less than a billion euro. If the government wants to keep the overall structure of the taxation system the same, the level of the measures taken so far is sufficient. Presumably the nature will change, though, and by fixing the bands, the lower ones in particular, and adjusting the official rates (and abolishing the income levy), income taxes should revert to their 2007 levels.

That, unfortunately, is the easiest of the lot. The next two smallest gaps concern predominantly business and international trade. Corporation tax looks like coming in €1.5bn below 2007 levels, while the customs and exise gap may be closer to €1.7bn. The latter in particular is probably out of government hands – if trade falls, trade falls, all it can do is promote exports to get this back up. (The only thing to do would be to hit domestic excise duties, e.g. on cigarettes and alcohol, yet again.) The former – increasing corporation tax – is more controversial. Low corporation tax rates have been a staple of Ireland’s enterprise policy for at least a generation and the argument against increasing our 12.5% tax rate at all is that business could see this is as the thin end of the wedge of drifting back up towards the EU average (which is getting a lot closer to our own rate anyway).

Here’s a thought, though. We’ve increased our rate before, when we increased it from 10% to 12.5%. The argument then was that this was due to exceptional circumstances, the EU having essentially put a gun to our heads. The outside option was working with the 40% rate, so international business appreciated the necessity of the increase. Given the current state of the Irish economy and the Irish fiscal situation, increasing corporate tax to 15% is a step worth considering – particularly if discussions with businesses currently based here are thorough. Ireland is unique, being an English-speaking EMU member, with GMT and an open labour market and well qualified young people. To sustain that, a one-off change needs to be made, just as it did a decade ago. Perhaps, this could be done in tandem with other strategic objectives of Irish enterprise policy, e.g. innovation or R&D tax credits, which may offset the total impact, while still achieving social outcomes. (These are the broad arguments for and against fiscal support for innovation.) Taxes that meet other objectives society has set itself – such as a carbon tax on sectors outside the EU Emissions Trading Scheme – could also be considered to ensure that business contributions increase in the order of €3bn back up to their 2007 levels.

In total, “fixing” income, corporate and trade taxes would boost Government revenues by about €4bn. This still leaves €8bn to sort out, though. Unfortunately, the bulk of this seems property-related, and therefore most unlikely to pick up any time soon. Perhaps the guts of €10bn of 2007 tax revenues, spread across capital gains, stamp duties and VAT, came directly from Ireland’s booming property market, which would also have boosted the rest of the VAT take as well as income tax. Whatever about VAT – whose gap this year compared to 2007 looks likely to be over €3bn – the €5bn gap across capital taxes and stamp duties cannot highlight more clearly the need for a sustainable source of government revenue from Ireland’s property, which after all represents the bulk of Irish wealth holdings.

I’ve argued before that a tax levied on residential property that averaged 1% could raise in the order of €4bn. Again, this could be combined with other government objectives, such as energy-efficient buildings, so that taxes do more than just fill government coffers. There is a lot of resistance to the idea of a property tax – much of it, such as this piece in the Irish Independent, couched in logistical difficulties. Next Monday, I’ll tackle these issues and show how a tax on residential property is very feasible, particularly if Ireland put its mind to it.

Given the state of the public finances and the fact that, even if we do generate €10bn in public expenditure cuts, we need to raise raxes by about €12bn, there can be no more compelling case for putting our minds to it than that.

  • Mack ,

    Hi Ronan,

    I think this –

    increasing corporate tax to 15% is a step worth considering

    Is potentially very dangerous. Michael Taft produced a graph of Irish and EU average corporate, personal and indirect tax takes as a percentage of GDP a couple of weeks back. Despite lower corporate tax rates, we take in higher than average corporation tax revenues as a percentage of GDP (and we have a high GDP per capita).

    http://notesonthefront.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8342f650553ef01156f81e70a970c-pi

    That suggests to me that in Ireland’s case, that our more competitive corporation tax rate is responsible for high corporation tax revenues.

    Given that we already have high corporation tax revenues, I think we should be looking at other ways to solve our fiscal mess (rather than pass the burden onto mostly foreign multinationals who seem to be responsible for the most dynamic portion of our economy anyway). If we do increase corporation tax – are we telling them, that we expect them to pay for our mistakes (benchmarking, bank bailouts)? I’m not sure that is an attractive proposition, and we may struggle to get future investment at anywhere near the same rates…

    • Ronan Lyons ,

      Hi Mack,

      Thanks for the comment. I’m fully aware that Ireland gets a bigger share of its tax revenues from corporation tax than most other OECD countries. Given how things are looking now, though, that will not be the case in a couple of years.

      What I was trying to do with this post was keep our taxation model the same – i.e. re corporation tax, a low rate producing a high return – but make sure we pay our way.

      The alternative is taxing people (either directly on their wages/weath or indirectly on their consumption). While that is certainly part of the solution, I think it will be damaging to Ireland’s competitiveness if we tax skilled labour too much. Recent statements by the Havok CEO about the difficulty in attracting skilled workers here because of the taxes they’d face highlight for me the danger of forgetting that these days capital and skilled labour go hand in hand. Being attractive to just one side – capital – will not be sufficient.

      R

      • Mack ,

        Ronan,

        Given how things are looking now, though, that will not be the case in a couple of years.

        This is worrying. Is our comparative advantage disappearing in this area? Do you think this is a temporary phenomena (medium term) linked to the downturn, or have the rules of the game changed?

        By the way, do you know if the commonly repeated fact, that 90% of our exports are from multi-nationals is true?

        The alternative is taxing people (either directly on their wages/wealth or indirectly on their consumption)

        Cutting government spending should play a role too. By the way, your proposal for a property tax is very fair (if it replaces stamp duty, and those who have already paid sd at penal rates get a rebate).

        Recent statements by the Havok CEO about the difficulty in attracting skilled workers here because of the taxes they’d face highlight for me the danger of forgetting that these days capital and skilled labour go hand in hand

        I absolutely agree raising personal taxes or indirect taxes will make matters worse. As a skilled worker in that industry, I also worry about potential difficulties in attracting high-tech employers! The only other point I would make on this issue, is tech salaries seem to have stagnated (at best) over the last 10 years or so (10% pay cut this year to boot), while those salaries our taxes pay for have sky-rocketed ahead. Perhaps there would be less need of higher taxes if some of the protected sectors in Ireland were opened up to the same kind of labour competition we face in tech!

        • Ronan Lyons ,

          Hi Mack,

          Thanks for coming back on this. On corporate taxes, while we do get a high proportion relative to most of our EU neighbours, we’re only just in line with the OECD (unweighted) average: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/48/27/41498733.pdf. On the actual rates levied, the trend is very much downward – see page 79 of the NCC’s report, http://www.competitiveness.ie/media/ncc090108_acr_2008.pdf, but even a 15% rate would be well below the EU15 average.

          On exports and exports from multinationals, it’s more difficult to know exactly but a large chunk of Ireland’s exports does come from sectors dominated by multinationals. Perhaps that’s worth a post over the summer to see if I can be more specific.

          On government expenditure, I totally agree. My only concern is that a 25% cut in public expenditure (and even that would only get us €15bn of the way there) might hit good and bad expenditure and even a 10% cut – such as in Latvia – could be tricky to do overnight. Some support to government cuts will have to come from tax increases.

          Glad to have some details on the wages in skilled IT. I think your point about competitive pressures ties in nicely with an overall point, which is that the government should only really be engaging in those activities where it can do them best. I’m not sure, for example, that IT administration or data storage or anything like that falls into that set of activities, so there really is lots of scope for reinventing, rather than just reorganising, our public sector so that it’s ‘future-proof’.

          R

          • Irish property tax, how to bring in a property tax | Ronan Lyons ,

            […] Browse in Irish Economy « Can we ignore higher corporate and property taxes? […]

            • Corporation tax, effective corporate tax rate, Ireland's corporate tax rate | Ronan Lyons ,

              […] weeks ago, I suggested that Ireland should look at two of its taxation policy sacred cows, as the country attempts to plug a hole approaching €25bn in its tax receipts with a mixture of […]

              • Irish public sector expenditure, health, education, social affairs | Ronan Lyons ,

                […] – both for tax receipts and for current public sector expenditure. Elsewhere, I’ve discussed some options to get our tax receipts up to €42bn. What elements of current expenditure must we look at, though, to reduce the Government’s […]

                Leave a comment